Do legislators from marginalized groups have intrinsic motivations to represent ‘their’ group? Previous observational and experimental research on this question focuses on elected politicians and is thus unable to fully disentangle a legislator’s intrinsic motivations from their need to win re-election. We address this limitation by observing the decision-making of appointed legislators who, by institutional design, have no re-election motive whatsoever. We administered to Canadian senators and their staff a novel survey instrument that captured how they prioritized learning about the policy opinions of various groups of citizens. We show that senators’ group identities—particularly those associated with racial and regional minorities— influenced which group’s views they chose to learn about. The findings refine the central conclusion of the literature and have implications for the study not only of unelected legislators but also of elected officials in settings where public monitoring is weak. 

Organisé par la Chaire de recherche en études électorales et la Chaire de recherche du Canada en démocratie électorale.

DATE : mardi 1er octobre, 12h-13h

LIEU : Salle C-4145, Pavillon Lionel-Groulx, 3150 Jean-Brillant